MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Becoming Citizens: Racialized Conceptions of ESL Learners and the Canadian Language Benchmarks

2010· article· en· W135862566 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Douglas Fleming

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationSociologyLinguisticsPedagogyComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I report a qualitative study that sheds light on how adult learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) are constructing new national identities in the context of the challenges associated with immigration. In particular, I trace how the common threads among their conceptions of citizenship compare with those embedded within official, na tional assessment, and curriculum documents. Using a broad questionnaire and a focused set of semi ‐ structured interviews at a large ESL site in British Columbia, my research rev eals the gaps between the experiences of these immigrants and how these documents construct and position idealized and racialized conceptions of second language learners. Key words: Adult ESL; identity; immigration; assessment and curriculum documents; semi ‐ structured interviews; gap analysis; racialized conceptions; language learning; Lang ‐ uage Instruction to Newcomers to Canada (LINC); language policy and planning Dans cet article, l’auteur presente une etude de cas qualitative qui permet de mieux com ‐ prendre comment des adultes apprenant l’anglais a titre de langue seconde (ALS) se facon ‐ nent de nouvelles identites nationales dans le cadre des defis associes a l’immigration. L’auteur analyse tout particulierement de quelle maniere les elements communs de leurs conceptions de la citoyennete se comparent a certains des themes des documents de curri ‐ culum et d’evaluation officiels. Reposant sur un vaste questionnaire et une serie ciblee d’entrevues semi ‐ structurees menees dans un grand centre d’ALS en Colombie ‐ Britannique, cette recherche revele les ecarts entre les experiences de ces immigrants et la facon dont ces documents creent et positionnent des conceptions a la fois idealisees et racia ‐ lisees des personnes apprenant une langue seconde. Mots cles : adultes en ALS, identite, immigration, documents d’evaluation et de curricu ‐ lum, entrevues semi ‐ structurees, analyse des ecarts, conceptions racialisees, apprentissage d’une langue, Cours de langue pour les immigrants au Canada (CLIC), politique ‐ et amen ‐ agement linquistiques

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207