Corales rugosos (Tryplasmatidae, Mucophyllidae y Cystiphyllidae) de la Formación Arpishmebulaq (Lochkoviense) en el SE de las montakas ke Tian-Shan (NO de China)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente trabajo se describen siete especies de corales rugosos pertenecientes a los géneros Tryplasma Lonsdale, 1845, Pseudotryplasma Ivaniya, 1958 y Mesophyllum Schlüter, l889 [subgénero Mesophyllum (Cystiphylloides) Chapman, 1893, sensu Birenheide, 1974] procedentes de la Formación Arpishmebulaq (Lochkoviense), en la sección estratigráfica de Arpishmebulaq (provincia de Xinjiang, SE de las Montañas de Tian-Shan, NO de China). Con la excepción de las especies Mesophyllum (Cystiphylloides) corniculum (Regnell, 1941) y M. (C.) cf. laticystis (Regnell, 1941) que eran conocidas ya en las Montañas de Tian-Shan (NO de China), las demás especies/subespecies incluidas en el trabajo, Tryplasma aequabile Lonsdale, 1845, Typlasma hercynica (Peetz, 1901), T. cf. tomtchumyshensis Zheltonogova, 1961, Pseudotryplasma sp. A y Mesophyllum (Cystiphylloides) macrocystis cf. macrocystis (Schlüter, 1889) han sido citadas en determinadas localidades, especialmente de la Federación Rusa. Las distribuciones geográfica y estratigráfica de las mencionadas especies confirman unas relaciones paleobiogeograficas estrechas, durante el Lochkoviense, con el este de los Urales, Altay, el Salair, así como con el E de China (provincia de Jilin). Tales relaciones, aunque más moderadas, existen tambien con Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, E de Australia y E de Norte América (Nevada y Yukon) y han sido puestas ya de manifiesto por los autores (Soto y Liao, 1998, 1999) para otros taxones de corales rugosos procedentes de la misma formación y localidad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".