MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W136494730

Measurement of the radiation emitted by nuclear medicine patients for radiation shielding calculations

2011· article· en· W136494730 on OpenAlexaff
Jabeen Hsiao, Curtis Caldwell, Karen Mahmood, Sophia Mahmood, Donato Simone, Hannah San Diego, Marne Jamieson, Ada So, Maribel Chung, Lorraine Gunzel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationNuclear medicineElectromagnetic shieldingRadiationMedicineEffective dose (radiation)Radiation protectionMedical physicsRadiation exposureRadiation doseMaterials sciencePhysicsOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2375 Objectives Regulatory bodies can require Nuclear Medicine facilities to provide calculations that show that radiation dose to staff and members of the public from exposure to patients administered radiopharmaceuticals are kept below specified levels. Conventional calculation methods often treat patients as sources and do not take into account self-attenuation and biologic excretion of activity over time. These calculation methods can result in money spent on structural shielding that might not be required if more accurate data regarding the radiation emitted by patients were available.The goals of this project were (1) to measure the radiation dose emitted by patients administered typical radiotracers as a function of time post-administration, for a representative sample of patients and (2) to develop models of the radiation dose emitted over time as functions of radioisotope, pharmaceutical, and patient size. Methods Marks were made on the floor 1 m to 4 m from areas where patients were administered radiopharmaceuticals and from the gamma cameras where they were scanned. The activity, time of administration, radiopharmaceutical and patient weight were recorded for a series of patients. Measurements of dose rate versus time and distance were recorded using a calibrated survey meter. Results Biological clearance depended on the radiopharmaceutical administered. However, there was variation in clearance of the same tracer in different patients. Self-attenuation correlated with body weight. Measured dose rates were significantly lower than those calculated using a point source model which did not take into account self-attenuation and biologic clearance. Conclusions When measured data is used instead of a point source model, lower estimates of radiation dose in areas near Nuclear Medicine patients result. Depending on local regulations, this could lead to significant savings by eliminating the need to add structural shielding

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207