MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Homocysteine stimulates chemokine expression in the kidney via NF‐kappa B activation

2008· article· en· W137140537 on OpenAlexaff
Sun‐Young Hwang, Yaw L. Siow, O Karmin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperhomocysteinemiaHomocysteineChemokineKidneyMonocyteInternal medicineEndocrinologyKidney diseaseMedicineInflammationImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperhomocysteinemia, a condition of elevated blood homocysteine levels, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disorders. Renal disease is an important factor causing hyperhomocysteinemia, the direct effect of homocysteine on the kidney is not well documented. One of the important features in kidney diseases is the infiltration of monocyte/macrophage in the kidney. Monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1) is a potent chemokine that stimulates monocyte migration into the tissue. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of hyperhomocysteinemia on MCP‐1 expression and the underling mechanisms in rat kidneys. Hyperhomocysteinemia was induced in rats fed a high‐methionine diet. The nuclear factor kappa‐B (NF‐κB) activity, the levels of MCP‐1 mRNA and protein were significantly increased in the kidneys of hyperhomocysteinemic rats. Pretreatment of hyperhomocysteinemic rats with a NF‐κB inhibitor completely abolished hyperhomocysteinemia‐induced MCP‐1 expression in the kidney. This further confirmed the causative role of NF‐κB activation in hyperhomocysteinemia‐induced MCP‐1 expression. Taken together, these results suggest that diet‐induced hyperhomocysteinemia can stimulate chemokine expression in the kidney via NF‐κB activation. Such an inflammatory response may contribute to renal injury and chronic systemic inflammation associated with hyperhomocysteinemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicFolate and B Vitamins Research→French-language works237,207→