Insights from the bar: A model of interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on recent changes in hospital use by seniors (aged 65 or over) who have been treated as inpatients in general and psychiatric hospitals for less than one year with functional psychoses and clinical disorders. The data analyzed are hospital separations for the age groups 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 and over, for the period 1980-89. The data are derived from hospital morbidity statistics submitted annually to Statistics Canada by the provincial ministries of health. Age-specific separation rates for the age groups 75 to 84, and 85 and over increased during 1980-89. However, for the age group 65-74, the rates were fairly stable and in some instances decreased. These increases in short-term hospitalization of the seniors 75 and over are evidence of the appreciation of their treatability and of the improved recognition of these disorders in this age group. Adverse reactions to prescription drugs resulting in psychiatric symptoms may also be a factor in the increasing hospitalization rates. The largest increases in age-specific rates and bed days were for the age group 85 and over. For this age group, the separation rates were higher for men than women. In this age group in 1986, a higher proportion of women than men lived in institutions. For seniors living outside institutions, a larger percentage of men than women lived alone. This situation likely promotes more social isolation for men than women, and may be an important factor in the higher hospitalization rates among men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".