Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identity formation from a relational viewpoint is a process of internalizing the expectations, needs, and opinions of significant others while recognizing and expressing one's own needs and interests. To achieve this, adolescents must resolve disagreement between their own and others' points of view through mutual regulation between self and others. This study examined mechanisms of transition between levels of relatedness in identity formation, focusing on transition to Levels 5 and 6 in which adolescents are actively engaged in balancing one's own and others' points of view. Participants in this qualitative study were 31 Japanese female university students ages 20 and 21 years. The Ego Identity Interview was administered three times during the junior and senior years at various points during the job seeking process. The interview covered occupations, friendships, dating, and sex roles. Interview transcripts were examined within two frameworks of the development in representation of relationships and the structural transition in identity formation. Findings indicated that disagreements between one's own and others' points of view at Level 5 were marked by recognizing discrepancies between an adolescent's existing representation of relationships and a new one. This new representation was mainly provoked by a significant other's act. Negative emotional states played an important role in constructing a new representation. Once the discrepancy between the representations was recognized, the discrepancy reduction process began. Coordinating the two representations was achieved intrapsychically rather than through verbal negotiation. Findings indicated that transition in levels of relatedness was promoted by interaction between the adolescent and others and the adolescent's individual effort with specific mechanisms influenced by the sociocultural context. (KB) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. TRANSITION IN THE LEVELS OF RELATEDNESS IN IDENTITY EXPLORATION Kazumi Sugimura Department of Psychology Otemon Gakuin University 2-1-15 Nishiai, Ibaraki-city Osaka 567-8502, Japan Phone: +81-726-41-9566, Fax: +81-726-43-9432 Email: sugimura@res.otemon.ac.jp Poster presented at the Eighth Annual Conference of the Society for Research on Identity Formation, London, Canada, May 3-6, 2001. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION YceCENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as ceived from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. 1 2 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY k<CLZ.t Wet1 WN.WCA:k. TO THE ED~ONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".