MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W140886565

Geography of British Columbia: People and Landscapes in Transition

2006· article· en· W140886565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Broadway

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyContext (archaeology)Human geographyGeographerSocial geographyRegional geographySettlement (finance)HistoryCartographyArchaeologyEconomic geography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brett McGillivray. Geography of British Columbia: People and Landscapes in Transition, 2nd ed. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2005. 282 pages. $95.00 cloth. Regional geography, the analysis of a defined area's physical and human characteristics, has a long tradition within geography. But in the aftermath of the discipline's so-called Quantitative Revolution in the late 1950s and early '60s it fell into disrepute for being too descriptive. As a consequence, regional geography courses became relatively rare on U.S. college campuses. Other social scientists stepped into this vacuum and area studies centers were created to undertake work previously done by human geographers. Against this background it was refreshing to read Brett McGillivray's Geography of British Columbia: People and Landscapes in Transition. This introductory college-level text provides a comprehensive portrait of Canada's third most populous province. The second edition, published in fall 2005, attests to the book's popularity and to regional geography's vitality north of the 49th parallel. Chapters 1 and 2 introduce human geographic concepts and physical processes that have shaped the province. At the end of Chapter 1 McGillivray subdivides British Columbia into eight regions and provides a description of each one's physical and human geography. Chapter 3 builds upon this foundation, surveying physical threats to human settlement including flooding, wildfires, avalanches, and earthquakes. Chapters 4, 5, and 6 provide a historical context by outlining the territorial evolution of the province, British colonial policies, and the treatment of First Nations and Asian immigrants by European settlers. The confiscation of Natives' land, cultural genocide, the forced removal of Japanese Canadians from the coast during World War II, and efforts to restrict Asian immigration remain scars on the province's history. An appreciation of these events is crucial to understanding the ongoing Land Claims process and efforts to compensate Chinese Canadians for the immigration head tax. McGillivray limits his analysis of population geography to Asian and First Nations issues, but in the next edition he might wish to consider broadening his account to include other groups that have enriched the province. Chapters 7 through 10 focus on managing the province's forest, fish, and mineral resources. Globalization has provided serious challenges for each resource, including access to foreign markets (softwood lumber), falling commodity prices (coal), and foreign competition (wild salmon fishery). At the same time the sustain-ability of the resource economy is threatened. More wood is being harvested than is accommodated by natural regrowth and replanting, while habitat destruction, disease, and overfishing have almost destroyed the wild salmon fishery. The future viability of resource-based communities is dependent upon finding a balance between conserving resources, and satisfying both the demands of private capital to make a profit and government's desire to maintain a tax base. Sustainability is a major theme of Chapters 11, 12, and 13, which examine energy, agriculture, and water in the province. The need to develop renewable energy resources is essential if Canada and the province are to meet their obligations under the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. In the past, B. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207