Phenolics and Antioxidant Activity of Saskatoon Berry ( <i>Amelanchier alnifolia</i> ) Pomace Extract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saskatoon berries (Amelanchier alnifolia Nutt.) have significantly higher levels of anthocyanins (ACY) among berries with potential health benefits. The pomace is a by-product of juice extracted from berries and is a potential source of inexpensive polyphenols. The objectives of this study were to extract the maximum amount of total phenolics from saskatoon pomace, to determine the antioxidant activity, and to identify individual phenolic components. Pomace extracts showed high content of total phenolics, total ACY, and total flavonoids of 43.3, 2.8, and 10.3 g/kg of dried weight (DW) of pomace. A high oxygen radical absorbing capacity value of 119.4 μmol Trolox equivalents/g DW and free radical scavenging activity of pomace extract (200 ppm, 86.8%) were observed. Five major ACY, two flavonols, and three chlorogenic acids were identified and quantified in pomace extracts. This study shows that saskatoon berries pomace rich in antioxidant phenolics could be extracted by "green" solvents (water and ethanol) and used as suitable food product applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".