Bibliographic record
Abstract
HVAC systems have a significant contribution to the building energy demand and greenhouse gases emissions. The use of effective evaluation indicators and accurate analysis method are very important for improving the energy performance of HVAC systems. The second law of thermodynamics analysis is an appropriate approach to evaluate HVAC system performance. This thesis presents the second law of thermodynamics analysis of a Water Loop Heat Pump (WLHP) system, applied to a commercial building located in Montreal. This system allows for the heat recovered in the core zone to be used partially in the winter for heating the perimeter zones. The analysis covers both peak design and annual operating conditions. The following equipment is included in the analysis: the water-to-air heat pumps, the boiler, the water circulating pumps, the fan and the heat ejector (e.g., cooling tower). Primary and secondary energy sources are considered, for instance in the case of the generation of electricity. Mathematical models developed in this study are implemented in the Engineering Equations Solver (EES) environment. The performance of the WLHP system is evaluated using indicators such as: the energy and exergy efficiency, the energy and exergy demand, the exergy lost, and the equivalent CO 2 emissions due to the system operation. The results show that the exergy efficiency of the WLHP system has an annual average value of 2.8%. The annual average value of the Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the WLHP system is evaluated at 1.68. The major exergy destruction components of the WLHP system are the boiler, the heat pumps in core zone and the cooling tower
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".