A successful pregnancy following 'double rescue' egg retrieval in a woman with Natural cycle IVF.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A case is reported of a patient with critically low anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) having successful 'rescue' oocyte retrieval in natural in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle 24 hours after the initial procedure had resulted in no oocyte being collected. Following administration of 10,000 units human chorionic hormone (hCG) a second retrieval was performed 24 hours after the first, producing one Metaphase-I oocyte. After in vitro maturation (IVM) over 4 hours in oocyte maturation medium, introcytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. A subsequent transfer of a 2-cell embryo proceeded on day 2. A positive hCG was recorded 15 days after embryo transfer (ET), and a viable clinical pregnancy has been confirmed. We believe this is the first reported case of a successful egg collection following a prior failed follicle aspiration in Natural IVF cycle. Factors such as good peri-follicular flow and initial follicular fluid cell content are probably essential before attempting a repeat procedure. This report highlights the importance of rescue IVM when an immature oocyte is collected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".