MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W142558063

Proceedings of the Seventh Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing

2010· article· en· W142558063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rama Chellappa, P. Anandan, A. N. Rajagopalan, P. J. Narayanan, Philip H. S. Torr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReputationLibrary scienceComputer scienceChinaGeographySociologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is our great pleasure to invite you all to the Seventh Indian Conference on Vision, Graphics and Image Processing to be held in Chennai, India. This conference is a continuation of the bi-annual series of ICVGIPs that originated in New Delhi in 1998. Subsequent conferences have been held in many well-known cities in India. This conference has emerged as one of the premier conferences in India. By adopting the review process and structure (double-blind, use of area chairs, single tracks, etc) that is used in other top tier vision conferences, ICVGIP is also acquiring a stature as an international conference of solid reputation. Right from the beginning, many outstanding researchers in India in the fields covered by ICVGIP have put their hearts and minds into having a high-quality conference and the attendees of this conference will not be disappointed. We are happy to note that the Seventh ICVGIP will host attendees from India, USA, UK, Germany, France, Denmark, Finland, China, and South Africa. The conference program has 24 oral presentations, 46 poster presentations, five plenary talks, and a tutorial. The plenary talks on a diverse set of topics will be given by well-known researchers from USA, France, Canada, Switzerland, and India. The tutorial on Markov random fields for computer vision will focus on a field that is reemerging in computer vision and graphics. Thus the attendees of this conference will be exposed to many cutting-edge research topics in the fields covered by the conference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207