MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W142829461 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a545-d

VMD2 accelerates kinetics of recombinant calcium channels: lack of effect of R141H

2007· article· en· W142829461 on OpenAlexaff
Ian M. Fearon, Stephen Brown, Rosemary Burgess, Forbes Manson, Graeme C. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsKineticsMutantRecombinant DNAPatch clampBiophysicsMolecular biologyChemistryAnatomyBiologyElectrophysiologyInternal medicinePhysicsMedicineBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the retinal pigment epithelium, VMD2 regulates L‐type voltage‐gated Ca 2+ channel kinetics, an effect which likely modulates the light‐peak response of the EOG. We examined the ability of VMD2, and a mutant R141H form of this protein, to regulate kinetics of recombinant Ca 2+ channels. HEK293 cells stably expressing L‐type Ca 2+ channel α 1C subunits were transiently co‐transfected with a RFP‐β 2a construct and either WT VMD2 or the R141H VMD2 mutant. Ca 2+ currents were recorded by whole‐cell patch‐clamp using 20 mM Ba 2+ as charge carrier. VMD2 accelerated Ca 2+ channel activation, observed as a decrease in time constants for activation (τ1 and τ2) following fitting of activating sections of current traces with a double exponential function. For example, at a test potential of +10 mV, τ1 and τ2 were 1.19 ± 0.05 ms and 8.10 ± 0.49 ms in the absence of VMD2 (n = 17), and 0.96 ± 0.05 ms and 6.03 ± 0.30 ms in its presence (n = 9; P < 0.05 for τ1 and τ2). Time constants were unaffected by expression of the R141H VMD2 mutant (τ1 and τ2 were 1.36 ± 0.06 ms and 8.04 ± 0.76 ms respectively; n = 9, P > 0.05). WT VMD2 also accelerated both channel inactivation and deactivation, effects which were greatly reduced or absent with the R141H mutant. These data confirm the regulation of voltage‐gated Ca 2+ channel function by VMD2, an effect absent when expressing a disease‐causing mutant. Supported by The British Heart Foundation and The Wellcome Trust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207