MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1428512742 · doi:10.1115/1.4031311

Influence of Changing Casing Groove Parameters on the Performance of Centrifugal Compressors Near Stall Condition

2015· article· en· W1428512742 on OpenAlex
Taher Halawa, Mohamed S. Gadala, Mohamed Alqaradawi, Osama Badr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroove (engineering)CasingStall (fluid mechanics)Centrifugal compressorAspect ratio (aeronautics)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceGas compressorGeometryMechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsMathematicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The casing treatment is an effective method for increasing the stall margin of compressors and enhancing the flow distribution at the blades tip. The present numerical study focuses on making an optimization of the casing groove parameters which can enhance the centrifugal compressor performance during stall. The casing grooves parameters considered are the groove cross section aspect ratio (the groove height to width ratio), groove location, and the number of grooves. Five groove aspect ratios were considered ranging from 0.2 to 1.8. Three groove locations were studied: at full blades leading edge, at splitter blades leading edge, and after the splitter blades leading edge by a distance equals to the distance between the first and second groove locations. Comparisons were made among different cases with number of grooves starting from one up to seven grooves located at the most effective locations and have the optimum cross section dimensions as deduced from the results of the groove aspect ratio and groove location optimization. Results showed that by using groove aspect ratio less than one, the reinjected groove flow is relatively weak but when the aspect ratio is equal to one, there is enough space inside the groove for the flow to circulate and generate the reinjected groove flow with higher velocities. When the groove aspect ratio was increased to be more than one, the reinjected flow velocity was increased slightly and its effective area was increased in the circumferential direction. Results also indicated that the best location for the groove is at the full blades leading edge because the stall area can be minimized and controlled in a better way comparing with the other groove locations. Results showed that by increasing the number of grooves, the surge margin (SM) increases and the isentropic efficiency decreases, but the stall area at the shroud surface decreases in size and its location is shifted toward the blades trailing edge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it