MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W143028052

The problem of pain in old age.

2013· article· en· W143028052 on OpenAlexaffabout
Małgorzata Dziechciaż, Luiza Balicka-Adamik, Rafał Filip

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChronic painPain catastrophizingDepression (economics)Neuropathic painMcGill Pain QuestionnairePhysical therapyPostherpetic neuralgiaFeelingAnalgesicOsteoarthritisPain scaleNeuralgiaPsychiatryVisual analogue scalePsychologyAnesthesiaAlternative medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elderly are more susceptible to feeling pain than young people. Pain is described as a complex, subjective feeling causing significant limitation of physical, psychical and social functioning. In the literature, there are many classifications of pain. Considering the duration, pain may be divided into acute and chronic. Acute pain does not depend on age and lasts less than three months whereas chronic pain is more frequent with the elderly and lasts more than three months. It can be divided into nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Involutional changes progressing in the organism of an old person, combined with numerous chronic diseases occurring in old age, cause approx. 85% of the elderly to suffer from pain. Among the diseases with concurring pain, the first are diseases of the locomotor system and include: osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, pain is an intrinsic part of malignant cancer, neuralgia shingles, and diabetic neuropathy. Pain also conceals depression and the depression intensifies the feeling of pain. Due to frequent cognitive disorders and depression, the measurement of pain in the elderly is difficult, it thus requires vast experience. To assess the pain intensity, subjective scales are used, e.g. verbal scale, score scale. To assess the qualitative and quantitative scales the following questionnaires are used: McGill-Melzak Pain Questionnaire and the Pain Assessment Form. Significant for pain assessment with people diagnosed with dementia are objective pain symptoms, namely: worsening appetite, gnashing teeth, grimaces. Pain treatment should be multimodal and include usage of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. Pharmacology is the basis for pain treatment in people of old age, which should be used in the least invasive way, starting with small dosages. The pain-relieving medicine of first choice is paracetamol. In the pharmacological treatment of old people there are also non-opioid pain relieving medicine, opioids and supportive medicine. Among non-pharmacological treatments are rehabilitation and psychological therapy. In pain treatment, awareness among the elderly, their families and carers, and medical staff that the pain is not an attribute of old age; thus, it can be correctly diagnosed and treated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207