MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cyclophilin A, a Novel Component of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> Comet Tails

2015· article· en· W1430515085 on OpenAlexafffund
Arandeep Dhanda, Julian A. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCell biologyCypaIntracellularListeriaActinMotilityCometBiologyCyclophilin ACellChemistryListeria monocytogenesBiochemistryBacteriaMolecular biologyAstrobiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes hijacks the actin polymerization machinery within human cells for its entry, intracellular movement and subsequent spreading from cell‐to‐cell. Intracellular motility of Listeria involves Arp2/3‐mediated actin polymerization at one pole of the bacteria, resulting in the generation of structures known as comet tails. During cell‐to‐cell spreading, comet tails protrude from the host cell membrane from structures referred to as listeriopods. Although the minimal protein constituents required for these actin‐based structures were identified years ago, a complete understanding of the molecular constituents and their specific functions at these sites remains to be investigated. Cyclophilin A (CypA) is a cytosolic protein involved in protein folding and potentially actin nucleation. Thus, because Listeria depends on actin‐based structures for crucial events in its disease process, we tested the hypothesis that CypA is recruited to Listeria comet tails and sites of cell‐to‐cell bacterial spreading. Through the use of fluorescently‐tagged CypA DNA constructs and time‐lapse imaging, we demonstrate that CypA is present at 1) the surface of Listeria prior to comet tail formation, 2) comet tails themselves and 3) listeriopods. Our data reveals a new component in the actin‐based motility of Listeria and suggests that CypA may play a crucial role in the cell‐to‐cell spreading of Listeria. Grant Funding Source : NSERC and departmental funds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207