Justice Intergeneration’s in John Rawls’ a Theory of Justice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study examined inter-generational justice in the theory of justice at John Rawls, as he see that justice is earlier than the good, people are not different about something like their differences on perceptions of good, more united than on justice; as Justice represents the fundamental basis for every rationally organized society that aims at the public benefit. Then, the study showed the political concept of justice at John Rawls, which aims to create new balances between rights - freedoms and rights – duties. The principles of the theory of justice at John Rawls sees justice as fairness is a form of liberalism to reconcile the contradictions of modernity and democracy, and between freedom and equality. The theory of distributive justice at John Rawls targets the less advantaged groups and the most deprived in society to revive the confidence of citizens in the constitutional institutions, resurrecting the solidarity in the souls of individuals who care only of their obsessive selfishness; as justice is the realization of a prudent balance. Rawls evoked the idea of complex approvals in the theory of justice to reveal how the political concept of justice can be steady and stable. The study has reviewed the diverse philosophical approaches in John Rawls's theory of justice, that considers the justice as a human right which guarantees the right within a legal valid framework that ensures the realization of the two faces of justice; equity and fairness, through the statement approaches of the Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor, the German philosopher Jurgen Habermas, the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, and the Italian philosopher Antonio Negri; which are four major readings of Rawls theory that stem from distinct backgrounds. تناولت الدراسة العدالة بين الأجيال في نظرية العدالة لدى جون رولز، ويرى أن العدل أسبق من الخير، فلا يختلف البشر حول شيء مثل اختلافهم حول تصورات الخير ولا يجمعهم ولا يوحدهم شيء أكثر من العدل، فالعدالة تمثل القاعدة الأساسية لكل مجتمع منظَّم عقلانيا يهدف إلى النفع العام. ثم بينت الدراسة المفهوم السياسي للعدالة عند جون رولز، والتي تهدف إلى خلق توازنات جديدة بين الحقوق -الحريات والحقوق - الواجبات، ومبادئ نظرية العدالة عند جون رولز ترى العدالة كإنصاف هي شكل من الليبرالية للتوفق بين متناقضات الحداثة والديمقراطية، وبين الحرية والمساواة. ونظرية العدالة التوزيعية عند جون رولز تستهدف الفئات الأقل حظا والأكثر حرمانا في المجتمع، وإحياء ثقة المواطنين في المؤسسات الدستورية، وبعث التضامن في نفوس الأفراد الذين لا يكترثون سوى بأنانيتهم الاستحواذية، فالعدالة تحقيق لتوازن متعقل. وقد استحضر رولز فكرة الوفاقات المعقًدة لنظرية العدالة ليكشف كيف للمفهوم السياسي للعدالة أن يكون ثابتا ومستقرا. وقد استعرضت الدراسة المقاربات الفلسفية المتنوعة لنظرية جون رولز للعدالة والتي تعتبر العدالة حق إنساني، يكفل الحق ضمن إطار قانوني شرعي يسهر على تحقيقها بوجهيها كمساواة وإنصاف، من خلال بيان مقاربات الفيلسوف الكندي تشارلز تايلور والفيلسوف الألماني يورغن هابرماس والفيلسوف الفرنسي بول ريكور، والفيلسوف الإيطالي أنتونيو نغري، وهى أربع قراءات رئيسية لنظرية رولز تنطلق من خلفيات متمايزة.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".