Ectopie urétrale chez le chien, valeur pronostique des paramètres urodynamiques, étude rétrospective sur dix cas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'ectopie ureterale est une anomalie congenitale du segment terminal de l'un ou des deux ureteres se caracterisant par un abouchement situe distalement au trigone vesical. Les sites privilegies d'ectopie ureterale sont le col vesical, l'uretre, le vagin ou l'uterus. L'ectopie ureterale se rencontre preferentiellement chez la femelle et chez certaines races telles que le labrador, le golden retriever, le husky de Siberie, le westie ou le fox terrier a poil dur. L'ectopie ureterale est une anomalie du developpement embryonnaire, rencontree classiquement sous deux formes, extramurale (l'uretere court circuite completement la vessie) ou intramurale (l'uretere traverse la sous muqueuse vesicale pour s'aboucher dans le col vesical, l'uretre ou le vagin). L'ectopie ureterale se rencontre frequemment associee a d'autres anomalies du tractus urinaire, telles que l'incompetence sphincterienne, l'absence ou l'hypogenesie des reins, une hydronephrose, un mega uretere ou une vessie pelvienne. Les explorations urodynamiques ont pour objectif l'evaluation du fonctionnement de l'appareil vesico sphincterien : compbance et contractilite vesicale et capacite d'ouverture/ fermeture de l'uretre. Ces investigations sont envisagees lors d'incontinence urinaire ou de dysurie. Par une etude retrospective sur dix animaux atteints d'ectopie ureterale et traites chirurgicalement, nous chercherons a evaluer si cet examen preoperatoire a une valeur pronostique quant a la reussite ou l'echec de l'intervention chirurgicale, c'est a dire la correction a court ou moyen terme de l'incontinence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".