MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 8884: Predictors of Adverse Effects on Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Patients with Previous History of Cerebrovascular Accident

2011· article· en· W143578977 on OpenAlexaff
Keiji Oi, Hiroaki Miyata, Noboru Motomura, Ryuzo Sakata, Tetsuya Yoshida, Kenji Yokoyama, Masashi Takeshita, Shinichi Takamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsiNano Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectCoronary artery bypass surgeryInternal medicineCardiologyArteryBypass surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Past history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is a serious risk factor for increased mortality and morbidity, such as CVA recurrence, after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Purpose of this study is to elucidate the independent predictors of adverse outcomes after CABG among the population with CVA history using a national database. Methods and Results: Patient data were acquired and analyzed from Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database (JCVSD) registry. 13109 patients undergoing isolated CABG between January 2008 and December 2009 were enrolled in the JCVSD registry. Of these, all the patients with CVA history were included in the analysis as study group (SG; n = 1695). Postoperative CVA occurred in 6.0% (102/1695) of SG and 2.8% (318/11414) of patients without CVA history (Control) (P<.001). Operative mortality of SG and Control were 2.9% and 1.9%, respectively (P=.008). Major morbidity and mortality of SG and control were 17.4% and 12.2%, respectively (P<.001). Multivariate analysis of SG identified five independent preoperative predictors for the CVA recurrence, eight for the operative mortality and 12 for the major morbidity and mortality. The analysis also identified two independent operative predictors for the CVA recurrence, four for the operative mortality and six for the major morbidity and mortality. The table shows the predictors of these adverse effects. Conclusions: Independent predictors of CVA recurrence, major morbidity and mortality were identified through subgroup analysis of the JCVSD registry. Patients who suffered CVA recurrence or other adverse effects had a greater prevalence of concomitant medical illnesses. In conclusion, use of internal mammary artery, off-pump CABG, otherwise shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, shorter operation time and optimal numbers of distal anastomoses are effective in reducing the risk of CVA recurrence or other adverse effects on CABG for patients with CVA history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques→French-language works237,207→