MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W144008583

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Freshwater Media: Factorial Effects and Human Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment

2014· article· en· W144008583 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maximilian Obinna Obiakor, J. C. Okonkwo, C. D. Ezeonyejiaku, C. N. Okonkwo

Bibliographic record

VenueResources and Environment · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluoranthenePyreneEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental sciencePollutantEcotoxicologyWater qualityFreshwater fishTilapiaToxicologyFactorial experimentPhenanthreneChemistryBiologyEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>Fishery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in water column and preponderant fish species of Anambra River were conducted. Eight PAHs (naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorine, phenanthrene, anthracene, pyrene, fluoranthene and benzo (a) pyrene) classified as priority pollutants by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and World Health Organisation were measured in the media following solid-phase extraction and gas chromatographic procedures on three factorial experimental model designs. Season was tested at two levels: rainy and dry; fish species at two levels: Synodontisclarias and Tilapia nilotica; and location factor at five levels: Enugu Otu, Ezi-Aguleri, Otuocha, Otu-Nsugbe, and Onono. The human PAH exposure risk was assessed and daily intake through fish consumption determined. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were found preponderant in the water and fish species for both rainy and dry seasons at the five distinct locations. Concentrations detected in these principal media were generally low compared to earlier studies and unaffected by the season, location and fish species, including all the factorial level interaction effects. However, the dietary intakes of the contaminant through fish consumption were a subject of public health concern on continuous daily exposure as the PAH concentrations in the examined fish sourced from some of the locations in different seasons were higher than stipulated values by Environment Canada for edible tissues of fish and/or shellfish for human consumptions. Effective and continued monitoring of the quality conditions of the river needs to be sustained and compared with baseline catchment data for quality deviation as crude oil production is expected to commence at this delicate site. Further quantifications of these organic substances in other fauna and investigation in entire flora of the river, and modelling of its trophodynamics would practically underpin sound management strategies and sustainability of the aquatic resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources and EnvironmentSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207