The study of potential raw cotton production to three species of cotton (Gossypium sp.) in report with fertilization degree and pedoclimatic conditions in the year 2009, in the weather conditions of Timisoara.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to emphasize the production potential of raw cotton through behavior analysis of three species of cotton (Marismas, Coko and Canada) from Greece and North America, in pedoclimatic conditions of Timisoara and in function of fertilization degree. Investigations developed during the period 20082010. Bifactorial experience was placed in the field after subdivided parcels method. The experimental factors established were: factor A agrofield (A1 N0P0K0, A2 N30P30K30, A3 N60P30K30, A4N90P60K60, A5-N120P60K60, A6-N30P30K30 + foliar fertilization); factor Bspecies (b1 MarismasGreece, b2 American provenance, b3 CokoGreece). It was made pedoclimatic factors monitoring during vegetation period. For production quality and quantity an important role had the three fertilizer macroelements: the azoth, phosphorus, and potassium, the azoth represented the dominant fertilizer factor. Analysis of vegetation conditions for the cotton realized during the period MayOctober, active vegetation period (180 days) bordering between seeding date (9 May) and the first autumn hoarfrost (the second decade of October month). Investigation brought a reference data base of cotton crop appreciated in Western Romania. Also, it was a good point of view to develop the agricultural field of Banat’s Plain. Production analysis of raw cotton, fibers and seeds obtained under species influence emphasized differences among them, in that way: by the weather conditions of Timisoara in the year 2009, the average productions of raw cotton were: Grecian species Marismas – 2005 kg/area, Grecian species Coko2069 kg/area, and Canada species 2145 kg/area. In separated analysis of every species under agrofield influence it distinguished two of agrofields with bigger influence on raw cotton production to the three species of cotton, such as, a4 N90P60K60 and a5-N120P60K60, respectively the azoth doses applying about 90 kg/area and on potassium and phosphorus field about 60 kg/area from every one. The three species of cotton presented a good adaptability to pedoclimatic conditions of Timisoara in the year 2009.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".