MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W145106693 · doi:10.1177/229255031202000408

Iatrogenic comminution of the phalangeal head during reduction or fixation of phalangeal neck fractures

2012· article· en· W145106693 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad M. Al‐Qattan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComminutionMedicineComplicationHead and neckSurgeryDentistryInternal fixationFixation (population genetics)Reduction (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic comminution of the phalangeal head during management of phalangeal neck fractures has not been previously investigated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the causes and outcomes of this particular iatrogenic complication. METHODS: A database of phalangeal neck fractures over a six-year period (2006 to 2011) was reviewed for this iatrogenic complication. Special attention was devoted to documenting the cause and pattern of comminution of the phalangeal head, as well as the outcome in range of motion. RESULTS: Of 152 cases treated during the study period, there were five (two children and three adults) with comminution. Two patterns of comminution were encountered: splitting and fragmentation of the phalangeal head. The complication occurred during open reduction and K-wire fixation, or during closed reduction in the emergency room. The outcome was generally poor and worse in patients with fragmentation of the entire head. Two of the five cases ultimately resulted in medicolegal claims. CONCLUSION: Comminution of the phalangeal head is a serious iatrogenic complication that may occur during the management of phalangeal neck fractures. Awareness of this complication is important and attempts should be made to avoid it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plastic SurgerySame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207