MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1466481694 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488542.009

Citizenship, globalization and the corporation

2008· book-chapter· en· W1466481694 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Crane, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLeadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporationGlobalizationCitizenshipPolitical scienceBusinessLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The forces of envy, despair and terror in today's world are stronger than many of us realised. But they are not invincible. Against them, we must bring a message of solidarity, of mutual respect and, above all, of hope. Business cannot afford to be seen as the problem. It must, working with government, and with all the other actors in society, be part of the solution. UN Secretary Kofi Annan, Address to the World Economic Forum, 5 February 2002 Introduction Throughout this book we have frequently come across the phenomenon of globalization. Initially we discussed the rise of corporate participation in a citizen-like way in the governance of various global issues, such as global warming and the fight against pandemics (Chapter 2). We also saw a shifting corporate role towards a government-like involvement in, for instance, governing global markets for goods and services or governing civic entitlements in global supply chains in countries with weak governance institutions (Chapter 3). In Chapter 4 we analyzed the political aspects of the community formed by the firm and its stakeholders and frequently referred to the potential global reach of this new arena. In this chapter, we first analyze and theorize the impact of globalization on the corporate involvement in the citizenship arena more systematically and, second, examine the effects of globalization on the reconfiguration of the very notion of citizenship itself and the role of corporations in shaping, and being impacted by, this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicLeadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs→French-language works237,207→