MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1468042391 · doi:10.22358/jafs/66811/2007

Microlocalization and distribution of digestionresistant aromatic lignin and cellulosic compoundsin feeds at cellular and subcellular levels: A novelapproach

2007· article· en· W1468042391 on OpenAlexafffund
Pei-Jung Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal and Feed Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCenters for Disease Control and PreventionU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsLigninCellulosic ethanolDistribution (mathematics)BotanyEnvironmental scienceChemistryBiologyEnvironmental chemistryCelluloseMathematicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to micro-localize the distribution of digestion-resistant aromatic lignin and cellulosic compounds in feeds at cellular and subcellular levels using advanced synchrotron-powered FTIR microspectroscopy (SFTIRM) as a novel approach. The SFTIRM is a newly emerging and nondestructive analytical technique and can reveal molecular chemistry (structural-chemical make-up) of biological samples at highly spatial resolutions (3-10 m) without destruction of the feed internal structures. The exampled feeds used for this pilot study were maize (cv. Pioneer) and barley (cv. Harrington). The results show that with SFTIRM, the images of the aromatic lignin and cellulosic compounds could be generated to be able to show the distribution and intensity across the feeds tissues. The digestion-resistant aromatic lignin compound only presented in the pericarp region and no lignin has been found in seed coat, aleurone layer and endosperm. The cellulosic compounds presented most in the pericarp region, less in the seed coat, aleurone layer, and endosperm. The agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis (AHCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed the distinct differences of the chemical make-up between the two feeds (maize vs barley) and between the different structures (pericarp vs aleurone) within a feed. Even in the same structural regions (such as aleurone layer, and endosperm), the structural make-up were different between the maize and barley. This may explain why digestive behaviours are different between the barley and maize. The implication of this study is that with extremely bright synchrotron light, we can localize and characterize internal feed digestion-resistant compounds in a chemical sense with Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 16, 2007, 505-525 cellular dimensions. With respect to human and animal nutrition, it is possible to relate digestive function and nutrient utilization to the specifi c chemical make-up of intrinsic structures of feeds. It is believed that with the advanced synchrotron technology, it will make a signifi cant step and an important contribution to feed molecular structural research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal and Feed SciencesSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207