MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W146823731

Nursing Identity and the Computer: The Impact of Care Realities on Information Systems Use

2012· article· en· W146823731 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hannah S Rasmussen

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Systems Theories and Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Information systemNursingComputer scienceInternet privacyMedicinePublic relationsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by developments in technology and communication, and by social, political and economic issues, the introduction of different information systems in nursing has risen significantly in recent years. However, little is known about the understanding of these systems by the nurses who are intended to use them.\nInformed by a Symbolic Interactionist approach, this research explored the experience of nurses interacting with information systems. Using grounded theory methods, the main sources of data were interviews, textual analysis and observation with nurses in three Canadian cities.\nThe key findings of this research are fourfold. First, the core category developed in this study is the care reality, a multi-faceted understanding of care that is central to the nursing identity, which adds a new level of understanding behaviour beyond the common attributes identified within nursing and information systems research. Second, this research identified the existence and importance of ready-to-hand and unready-to-hand information systems objects within nursing. Third, this research identified a care reality negotiation process, where each individual is continuously introduced to different care realities when they come into contact with co-workers or management who do not share the same care reality. The individual must then go through a negotiation process whereby each individual manages his or her care reality. The care reality negotiation process includes four phases: exposure, developing consciousness, sense-making and acclimatizing. Finally, the fourth result of this research was the identification of how an individual’s identity impacts on his or her understanding of information systems.\nThis research produces a theoretical understanding of the experiences of nurses interacting with information systems. It identified a link between an individual’s care reality and his or her behaviour toward all technology, including information systems.\nThe findings inform nursing research and practice, as well as contribute to the development, implementation and use of information systems in other areas of the modern healthcare system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.013
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207