Aperçu d’un jeu de ficelle inuit (et de ses variantes) à partir d’un fragment de film de Jean Gabus (1938/39)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution propose un apercu de quelques proprietes procedurales de jeux de ficelle inuit, a partir de la presentation d'une figure a motif triangulaire realisee dans la quasi-totalite de l'aire inuit, et enregistree sur un support filmique — pour la premiere fois semble-t-il — par l'ethnologue suisse Jean Gabus en 1938/39. Ce document filmique (ici mis en ligne) est d'abord situe au regard des brefs ecrits de Gabus sur les jeux de ficelle des Inuit « Caribou » du Canada — et en particulier de son interpretation concernant leur dimension « magique » — (Celine Petit), puis il est commente par Stephan Claassen, qui explicite notamment la sequence finale du jeu fondee sur une intervention a deux sur la figure de fil (dite de « l'anus », de « la bouche », du « piege » ou du « petit doigt »). Certains aspects proceduraux impliques dans la creation de cette figure — et de ses variantes — sont enfin plus particulierement evoques, a partir de donnees ethnographiques recueillies dans differents groupes inuit, dans les annees 1910 (par Diamond Jenness) et dans les annees 2000 (Celine Petit).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".