Outcomes associated with cardiac rehabilitation participation in patients with musculoskeletal comorbidities.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD) and musculoskeletal comorbidities (MSKCs) have much to gain from physical activity, yet are less likely to be referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) than those without MSKCs. Whether patients with MSKCs achieve demonstrated benefits of CR participation such as improved quantity and quality-of-life remains unknown. AIM: To compare all-cause mortality, major acute cardiovascular events (MACEs), quality-of-life and psychosocial well-being in patients with CAD and coexisting MSKCs by CR participation. DESIGN: Prospective and observational study in which patients were administered a questionnaire in the hospital and 1 year later. The cohort was linked to provincial databases. SETTING: Eleven hospitals in Ontario, Canada. POPULATION: CAD patients (N.=1680). METHODS: CAD inpatients were administered a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Clinical data were extracted from charts. CR participation, quality-of-life, depressive symptoms, functional status, and physical activity behavior were measured 1 year later by questionnaire. The cohort was linked to provincial administrative databases to ascertain mortality and MACEs for a median of 2.7 years post-index cardiac hospitalization. Associations of CR participation with outcomes were tested after adjustment for differences in participation propensity. RESULTS: Of study participants, 50.7% (851/1680) had MSKCs and of those with MSKCs, 49.8% (424/851) participated in CR. Patients with MSKCs who participated in CR had greater physical quality-of-life (P<0.03) and lower mortality than those with MSKCs who did not attend CR, after adjusting for propensity for CR participation (1.4% vs. 4%; participant vs. non-participants, P=0.03) - non-participants' hazard ratio 3.91 [95%CI,1.23-12.36]). There were no differences for MACEs. CONCLUSION: Among those with MSKCs, participation in CR is associated with survival benefit and better physical quality-of-life compared to non-participants. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our findings showing the high prevalence of MSKCs in those with CAD and the benefits of CR, add to the literature that will provide the basis for exploration of initiatives to improve care for those with CAD and MSKC, and to overcome barriers to improved outcomes and reduced death. These results will help to guide focused research to optimize complex outpatient care in this group, including increasing the utilization of CR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".