MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 20514: Adults With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Outcomes in a New Cohort of Patients

2014· article· en· W1479807802 on OpenAlexaff
William Wilson, Candice K. Silversides, Anne Marie Valente, Erwin Oechslin, S. Lucy Roche, Luke J. Burchill, Craig S. Broberg, Edward Hickey, Leeanne Grigg, Eliza Teo, Isabelle Von Der Muhll, Patrick H. Gibson, Jasmine Grewal, Paul Khairy, Matthias Greutmann, Kelsey Hickey, Yaso Emmanuel, Paul Clift, Rachel M. Wald

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of AlbertaToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoplastic left heart syndromeCardiologyInternal medicineHypoplasiaHeart diseaseStenosisVentricleCardiac catheterizationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Surgical palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) has only been possible for the past few decades. Prior to this, without heart transplantation, HLHS was universally fatal in infancy. The oldest survivors of palliated HLHS are only now entering adulthood and limited data are available regarding their welfare. Methods: For this multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study, 6 adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) centers contributed data regarding all HLHS patients aged >18 years followed at their institution. HLHS was defined as a dominant right ventricle (RV) and diminutive left ventricle with a combination of mitral valve disease (stenosis [MS] or atresia [MA]) and aortic valve disease (stenosis [AS] or atresia [AA]). Patients with single RV physiology without hypoplasia of left heart inlet and outlet structures were excluded. All available clinical data, including cardiac imaging, cardiac catheterization results and exercise tests were reviewed. Results: The study included 53 HLHS adults (65% male) with mean age 21.8±3.6 years. Underlying cardiac anatomy was AA&MA (n=21, 41%), AS&MS (n=19, 37%), AS&MA (n=10, 20%), and AA&MS (n=1, 2%). Stage 1 Norwood was completed at age 6.0±4.4 days, Glenn shunt at age 10.8±8.7 months and Fontan at age 3.3±2 years. Stage 1 cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest times were 94±46 and 59±2 minutes respectively. The mean duration of follow-up in an ACHD center was 3.4±2.5 years. After age 18 years, major adverse events had occurred in 15/53 patients (28%). These mutually exclusive events were: death (n=3, 6%), transplant (n=1, 2%), protein losing enteropathy (n=2, 4%), stroke (n=2, 4%), symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (n=1, 2%), heart failure requiring admission for intravenous therapy (n=3, 6%) and major cardiac surgery (n=3, 6% [aortic valve replacement n=1, tricuspid valve replacement n=2]). Conclusions: Young adults with a Fontan palliation for HLHS are at high risk of major adverse cardiac events. It is essential that close attention is paid to successful transition of this vulnerable population into adult care and that these patients remain under vigilant specialist follow-up through adult life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→