Bibliographic record
Abstract
Review emet . Dinler presents her studies as expository essays on the subject of other than her doctoral thesis in her book named as "inin Varlk Problemi (Workers Existence Problem)" published by Metis Publishings in October 2014.She conducted her studies in 2007 -2011 period when she focused on doctoral thesis writing and organizing processes.On the essays, she collected in eight different categories, Dinler investigates the workers who gather waste paper depending on their class feelings.The book Workers Existence Problem consists of eight essays which names are Class, Body and Performance, When a Worker Moves upto The Social Ladder, Collective Act and Feelings, Union Status Quo, Pavilion Door, A Letter from A Western Academician to The Eastern Worker Leader, In The Market, The Feelings Building the Class in The Street and The Work Place. 2Dinler analyzes the male workers whose job is to gather waste papers as his natural working area on the subjects of class division, masculinity and his feelings.She puts the workers who gather waste papers, the old workers who try to become (capitalist) depot owners, a labor union president and a worker leader who makes organization efforts on their working subjects to her book's centre.We can mention some examples from eight different essays.She depicts organizational developments as stating that all of the events taken issue is fictional in "Sendika Koltuu (Union Status Quo)" which is one of her essays.In this essay, Dinler narrates a union president who does not create better working consitions within collective work aggrements and even more he does not read the collective work aggrements which are built by other labor unions.Furthermore he makes strategic plans in order not to lose his status quo and without hesitation acting with the employers, he fires the workers who are about to be a problem for himself.I think that the prototype of the mentioned union president in the book represents many union presidents in Turkey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.027 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".