MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480325471 · doi:10.1002/9781118910924.ch50

Cisterna Chyli and Thoracic Duct Glue Embolization

2015· other· en· W1480325471 on OpenAlexaff
Ameet Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThoracic ductMedicineChylothoraxEmbolizationLymph ductRadiologyLymphatic systemLigationSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thoracoscopic thoracic duct ligation and pericardectomy with cisterna chyli ablation have been recently described as minimally invasive alternatives to open surgical procedures. Glue embolization of the cisterna chyli and thoracic duct via percutaneous puncture using fluoroscopic guidance has been described for treatment of traumatic and non-traumatic chylothorax in humans, and has gained popularity over thoracic duct ligation because of its minimally invasive approach. Both dogs and cats presenting with idiopathic chylothorax are candidates for cisterna chyli and thoracic duct glue embolization. Lymphangiography is a helpful step prior to performing cisterna chyli and thoracic duct glue embolization as it provides the surgeon with relevant lymphatic anatomy. Routine techniques are used to perform an exploratory celiotomy and all abdominal structures are thoroughly examined. Once cisterna chyli and thoracic duct anatomy have been verified, the embolization procedure can be performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207