MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1480345881 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.140

Abstract 140: Long-term disability after lacunar stroke: Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Stroke Study

2014· article· en· W1480345881 on OpenAlexaff
Mandip S. Dhamoon, Leslie A. McClure, Carole L. White, Oscar Benavente, Mitchell S Elkind

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Lacunar strokeActivities of daily livingQuartilePhysical therapyGerontologyInternal medicineConfidence intervalIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Long-term disability after lacunar stroke is under-studied. We hypothesized that vascular and demographic risk factors predict worsening disability after recovery from lacunar stroke, even in the absence of recurrent stroke. Methods: The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Stroke Study is a clinical trial in lacunar stroke patients with annual assessments of disability with the Older Americans Resources and Survey Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale (range 0-14), measuring 7 IADLs. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the likelihood of disability (IADL score <14) over time, adjusting for demographics, medical risk factors, cognitive and mood factors, and region in univariate and multivariable models. IADL assessments after recurrent stroke were censored. We stratified by study region and age quartile (<55, 55-63, 63-72, ≥72 years), and the final model excluded non-significant terms. Results: Among 2820 participants, mean age was 63.4 years (SD 10.8), 63% were male, 51% White, 32% Hispanic, 36% had some college education, 36% had diabetes, 90% had hypertension, and 10% had prior stroke. Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Mean IADL score at 3 months was 12.5 (SD 2.5), and 43% were disabled. In multivariable models, female sex (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8), diabetes (1.52, 1.30-1.75), current smoking (1.28, 1.06-1.54), non-regular alcohol use (1.6, 1.4-1.9), prior stroke (1.61, 1.28-2.00), cognitive assessment screening instrument score (0.98 per point, 0.97-0.98), and depression (1.79, 1.49-2.17) were associated with disability. The youngest age quartile had decreased odds of disability over time (OR 0.56 per year, 95% CI 0.36-0.91), whereas the oldest age quartile had increased odds (1.33, 0.83-2.22). There was heterogeneity by region (p<0.0001): Americans and Latin Americans had 2.5-fold greater odds of disability per year compared to Spaniards. Conclusion: In lacunar stroke patients, older age predicted worsening long-term disability, even without recurrent stroke. Worse long-term function was associated with vascular risk factors and prior stroke, and regional differences may have been due to geographic variations in health care delivery or scale interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→