The effects of prior hyperventilation duration on central chemoreflex responses using the “Duffin” hyperoxic rebreathing test (1092.16)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of prior hyperventilation duration on central chemoreflex responses using the “Duffin” hyperoxic rebreathing test The “Duffin” hyperoxic rebreathing test was developed from the “Read” rebreathing test by the addition of a five‐minute hyperventilation (HV) prior to switching to the rebreathing circuit. This HV eliminates CO 2 stores, such that when the subject equilibrates with the rebreathing circuit, brainstem CO 2 is below the ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT) of the central respiratory chemoreceptors. This allows investigators to quantify the VRT prior to eliciting a central chemoreflex to increases in CO 2 during rebreathing. An assumption of the test is that a full five minutes of prior HV is required. However, prolonged HV is uncomfortable for the subject, and there is no experimental evidence to validate this assumption. We aimed to test this assumption experimentally by comparing various durations of prior HV. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in central chemoreflex responses between randomized prior hyperventilation durations (HVD) of one, three and five minutes. Following instrumentation with a pneumotachometer and CO 2 and O 2 gas analyzers, 19 subjects underwent three hyperoxic rebreathing trials, each with randomized prior HV of one‐, three‐ and five‐minute durations, each coached to 18‐20 Torr PCO 2 . Rebreathing was carried out by switching to a circuit comprised of a 6L bag containing 7% CO 2 and 93% O 2 . For all three trials, we quantified the VRT (PCO 2 ; Torr), and respiratory frequency (min ‐1 /Torr CO 2 ), inspired tidal volume (L/Torr CO 2 ) and inspired ventilation (L/min/Torr CO 2 ) with linear regression. We found no differences between HVD in any respiratory variable, within‐subject. Our data suggest that when using the “Duffin” rebreathing test, a one‐minute HV is sufficient to drive CO 2 stores below the VRT, and the resulting central chemoreflex responses are no different than the standard five‐minute test. Grant Funding Source : NSERC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".