MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480635838

Éva Circé-Côté. Les femmes et les médias au Québec au début du xxe siècle

2012· article· fr· W1480635838 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Laurie Laplanche

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publiee en 2010 aux Editions du remue-menage, la biographie d’Eva CirceCote retrace le parcours personnel, professionnel et ideologique de cette femme qui a contribue a alimenter les debats publics et l’imaginaire collectif au Quebec au debut du xxe siecle. L’objectif de l’auteure, l’historienne Andree Levesque, est d’ouvrir « une fenetre sur le Quebec progressiste des premieres decennies du xxe siecle », un courant minoritaire et radical auquel appartenait Eva Circe-Cote et qui a ete occulte de « l’histoire sociale et culturelle du Quebec » (13; 210). Afin de permettre aux lecteurs de se familiariser plus en profondeur avec la reflexion de la libre-penseuse, les Editions du remuemenage ont egalement fait paraitre en 2011 un recueil de chroniques choisies et recensees par Andree Levesque. Grâce a sa biographie et son recueil de chroniques, elle fait revivre les idees de Musette, Colombine, Fantasio, Jean Bard, Jean Ney, Paul S. Bedard, Arthur Maheu et Julien Saint-Michel, quelques-uns des differents pseudonymes associes a la plume d’Eva CirceCote. Andree Levesque parvient a surmonter les obstacles lies a l’usage courant de pseudonymes et a l’heritage pratiquement inexistant de sources intimes laissees par Eva Circe-Cote. Elle offre par consequent deux ouvrages riches en informations et en citations de cette intellectuelle « trop longtemps negligee » dans l’historiographie (2011 : 13). S’appuyant sur un travail meticuleux de recherche en archives et d’analyse de sources tout en mettant a contribution ses contacts avec des descendants review essay / note critique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207