Re-envisioning resurgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amidst ongoing, contemporary colonialism, this article explores Indigenous pathways to \ndecolonization and resurgence with an emphasis on identifying everyday practices of renewal \nand responsibility within native communities today. How are decolonization and resurgence \ninterrelated in struggles for Indigenous freedom? By drawing on several comparative examples \nof resurgence from Cherokees in Kituwah, Lekwungen protection of camas, the Nishnaabekwewag \n“Water Walkers” movement, and Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiian) revitalization of \nkalo, this article provides some insights into contemporary decolonization movements. The \npolitics of distraction is operationalized here as a potential threat to Indigenous homelands, \ncultures and communities, and the harmful aspects of the rights discourse, reconciliation, and \nresource extraction are identified, discussed, and countered with Indigenous approaches centered \non responsibilities, resurgence and relationships. Overall, findings from this research offer \ntheoretical and applied understandings for regenerating Indigenous nationhood and restoring \nsustainable relationships with Indigenous homelands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it