MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W14807699

His passionate bride

2004· article· en· W14807699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sylvie Bringas, Monika Forsberg

Bibliographic record

Venue˜Die œPharmazie · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimationArtVisual artsStyle (visual arts)Literature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A drawn short animation film (3 mins) produced by Bringas in collaboration with Monika Forsberg as director. They won a joint\n\nBAFTA nomination for it. The film tells a tongue in cheek story of love and romance, though a self-conscious recycling of codes and conventions of female popular novels.\n\nHis Passionate Bride was commissioned by Channel Four’s Animator in Residence scheme and produced on £40K budget to\n\nfull broadcast and theatrical specifications. Bringas (producer) and Forsberg (director)) were nominated for a BAFTA in 2005.\n\nThe film screened on 35 mm film at festivals, including Melbourne, Annecy, Ottowa, Toronto, Dresden, Créteil, Upsalla.\n\nClermont Ferrand. It was also shown at MOMA, New York; ICA, London; and British Animation Awards; and broadcast on C4\n\nand SBS (Australia) in 2004. The film won Best Animation award at Granada International Film Festival (2005). It is distributed\n\non British Animation Awards’ DVD ‘Sexuality and Desire: Animating the Unconscious’.\n\nHis Passionate Bride uses a distinctive graphic approach which has evolved from the development of Forsberg’s personal style\n\ninto new territory through collaboration with Bringas. The characters are stylised in a fluid manner that does not fit the rigid\n\nworking practices of cartoon animation. The technique is based in metamorphosis rather than the principles of caricature,\n\neschewing the graphic continuity and elasticity that define more orthodox forms of cartoon. Other elements of the style involved\n\nusing rough cycling textures for colouring in the graphic elements, a stylistic concept devised and implemented by Bringas.\n\nProduction lasted 8 months. Development processes were kept fluid with Bringas and Forsberg working collaboratively on the\n\nfirst animatics, writing dialogues, recording a guide track, and ultimately working with editor Nicolas Chaudeurge to produce a\n\nfinal project with an understandable narrative. Sound design and music were composed according to joint directions from\n\nBringas and Forsberg.\n\nBringas works in a collaborative relationship with her directors, with ongoing dialogue about all creative decisions, and has\n\nestablished herself internationally as a leading producer of innovative animation. Bringas and Forsberg are currently writing an\n\nanimated series based on this film.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜Die œPharmazieSame topicMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingFrench-language works237,207