MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical staging and electroencephalographic evolution of continuous spikes and waves during sleep

2012· article· en· W1480801627 on OpenAlexaff
Iván Sánchez Fernández, Jurriaan M. Peters, Stavros Hadjiloizou, Sanjay P. Prabhu, Marcin Żarowski, Karen M. Stannard, Masanori Takeoka, Alexander Rotenberg, Sanjeev V. Kothare, Tobias Loddenkemper

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital of Winnipeg
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteEisaiHarvard CatalystEpilepsy Foundation
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpilepsyPediatricsNeuropsychologySlow-wave sleepPsychologyMedicineAudiologyPsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Currently, in continuous spikes and waves during sleep (CSWS) there is a lack of systematic assessments of the clinically relevant stages and the evolution of the electroencephalographic features. The aim of this study is to describe the evolution over time of clinical and electroencephalographic features in CSWS. METHODS: We enrolled patients from our video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring unit with CSWS and with overnight EEG studies with at least one overnight assessment per year over a minimum period of 3 years. We studied clinical presentation and electroencephalographic features. We calculated the (1) spike-wave percentage (SWP) as the percentage of 1-s bins containing at least one spike-wave complex and (2) spike frequency (SF) as the number of spikes per 100 s. KEY FINDINGS: Nine children (six boys) met the inclusion criteria during a 15-year period. Seven (78%) had an abnormal development prior to the epilepsy onset, and in two (22%) seizures were the only presenting symptom. Median age at epilepsy onset was 2 years (range 2 days to 4 years), at neuropsychological regression 5.1 years (4-7.7 years), and at seizure freedom 8.6 years (6.5-11.4 years). Median duration and range of clinically relevant stages were as follows: dormant stage (birth-epilepsy onset median 2 years, range 2 days-4 years), prodromal stage (epilepsy onset-neuropsychological regression 3.9 years, range 0.9-7.7 years), acute stage (neuropsychological regression-seizure freedom 2.9 years, range 2.1-6.6 years), and residual stage (after seizure freedom). Seven patients (78%) had a structural lesion on neuroimaging. At last follow-up (median 11.4 years, range 7.2-20.3 years), eight patients (89%) were receiving antiepileptic treatment, and all patients had residual neurocognitive deficits. During the acute stage, SWP was <85% in 13 (42%) of 31 assessments, and after seizure freedom, 3 of 5 patients (60%) had SWP >85%. Evolution of electroencephalographic patterns included increasing-decreasing, continuously elevated, and fluctuating patterns (33.3% each). There was good correlation between SWP and SF (Spearman correlation-coefficient = 0.942; p < 0.0001). SF, which can exceed 100%, reflected changes in electroencephalography pattern in more detail than SWP, which cannot exceed 100% and therefore has a ceiling effect. SIGNIFICANCE: Our series systematically studied the age of occurrence of the significant clinical events. These may assist in defining clinical stages, which can provide a useful framework for future clinical trials in patients with CSWS. The severity of the epileptiform discharges on EEG did not always correlate with seizure frequency and severity; epileptiform discharges could be prominent after seizure freedom and fluctuated along the course of the disease. The values of SWP and SF correlated well, but SWP based on 1-s bins has the potential disadvantage of a ceiling effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207