MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of External Electric Field Upon Selected Proteogenic Amino Acids

2013· article· en· W1481150017 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Józef Mazurkiewicz, Piotr Tomasik

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoleucineAmino acidValineAlanineMethionineGlycineLeucineCysteineArginineChemistryTryptophanGlutamic acidSerineMoleculeTyrosineStereochemistryCrystallographyBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effect of external electric field (EEF) of 0.001, 0.005 and 0.01 a.u. upon molecular energy, charge distribution and dipole moments of non-dissociated and inner salt forms of alanine (Ala), arginine (Arg), aspartic acid Asp), cysteine (Cys), glutamic acid (Gln), glycine (Gly), isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), ornithine (Orn), proline (Pro), serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), tryptophan (Trp), tyrosine (Tyr), and valine (Val) were studied. For that purpose HyperChem 8.0 software was used together with the AM1 method for optimization of the conformation of the molecules in a computer vacuum. Based on the effect of EEF upon the charge density localized at the nitrogen atom of the α-amino group the acids were divided into two groups. They were Group I in which EEF increased the negative charge (Ala, Gly, Ile, Leu, Lys, Met, Phe, Pro, and Thr) and Group II in which EEF induced opposite effect (Cys, Ser, Tyr and Val). Generally, an increase in the EEF strength declined energy and increased dipole moments in non-ionized amino acids and in their inner salt forms. Energy of non-dissociated forms was more negative than these of corresponding zwitterions. Orientation of the molecules in EEF strongly depended on the EEF strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciencesSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207