Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1912 etait creee la toute premiere station de recherche pomicole au Quebec. Cette station du ministere de l’Agriculture du gouvernement du Canada, d’abord localisee a Covey Hill, a ete transferee a Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu et est ensuite devenue le Centre de recherche et de developpement en horticulture (CRDH). S'ensuivit, en 1969, l'ouverture d’un verger experimental a la Ferme de recherche federale de Frelighsburg. Quant au gouvernement du Quebec, il inaugurait, en 1951, la Station de recherche en protection des vergers a Farnham. En 1975, il mettait sur pied le Reseaupommier, qui designait et designe toujours le regroupement des intervenants de la recherche, du developpement et du transfert technologique de la protection des vergers de pommiers au Quebec. Depuis sa creation, le Reseau chapeaute un « reseau » de vergers pilotes et coordonne la production et la diffusion des avertissements phytosanitaires du pommier. Ces derniers ont servi de modele pour l'actuel Reseau d'avertissements phytosanitaires dans plusieurs autres cultures. En 1990, le ministere de l’Agriculture, des Pecheries et de l’Alimentation du Quebec (MAPAQ) fermait la station de Farnham et il concentrait ses activites en protection des vergers a son Centre de recherche en protection des cultures de Saint-Hyacinthe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".