MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1481622581

Higher education. Internationalisation of universities: the "2015 University Strategy"

2010· article· en· W1481622581 on OpenAlex
Màrius Rubiralta

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigher educationInternationalizationBusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsPedagogyEconomic growthSociologyEconomicsInternational trade
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When talking of internationalisation of the Spanish university system, we need to refer to the process started in 1999, when the ministers in charge of higher education from 29 European countries signed the Bologna Declaration.This introduced the so-called Bologna Process aimed at articulating higher education within an overall project to create a European Higher Education Area. MRIUS RUBIRALTAThe ten-year period set to implement the agreements reached in the Bologna Process finished in 2010.This anniversary was celebrated under the Spanish EU presidency at an extraordinary minister conference held in Budapest and Vienna on 11 and 12 March.The balance of this decade of project building was described in the Budapest-Vienna declaration on the European Higher Education Area, approved at the Hofburg Congress Centre-Festsaal in Vienna on 12 March.This project has gone beyond Europe, raising the interest of university systems of other countries.Internationalisation of the Bologna Process, which started formally at the minister conference in Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve ( 2009) with the creation of the Bologna Policy Forum, demonstrates the great interest this project raised in different countries like the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand as well as in Africa.This shall be related with the international character of the Spanish university system (SUS), considering historical academic ties between Spanish and Latin American universities.Countries like Mexico, Argentina and Brazil have shown their interest in the Bologna Process, acknowledging the role the SUS can play in developing an Ibero-American Higher Education Area and as transatlantic bridge in developing a knowledge-based society.The aim of setting the future base of this new global area guided the 2nd International Meeting of Universities (especially from Latin America) recently held in Guadalajara, Mexico. Legal framework regarding internationalisation of universitiesSpanish universities initiated a strong modernisation process, especially within their functions but also their internal management.Some change is also structural in order to adapt universities to the big social and economic challenges and to increase their presence and visibility at international or global level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it