Microsurgical nerve root decompression in scoliotic lumbar spines—the relationship between important anatomical structures in correlation to imaging and implications for daily practice: anatomic cadaveric study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT In a retrospective study in cadavers, the authors investigated the anatomical parameters between the convex and concave side in lumbar scoliosis for microsurgical discectomy and the decompression of spinal stenosis. Microsurgical intervention is the gold standard for lumbar herniotomy or the decompression of the spinal stenosis. However, the risk for complications during these procedures is higher due to the anatomical variations caused by the scoliosis. METHODS In 4 adult cadaveric scoliotic lumbar spines, the authors studied the anatomical relationship between important structures for performance of microsurgical discectomy or decompression, such as the dural sac, spinal nerve roots, and adjacent anatomical structures. They measured the following distances and compared these findings with those acquired using conventional radiographs in daily practice: nerve root outlet-ganglion center, nerve shoulder-superior disc, nerve shoulder-pedicle, nerve axilla-pedicle, nerve axilla-lower pedicle, ganglion center-pedicle, ganglion center-lower pedicle, and nerve root angle. RESULTS The mean distance of nerve root outlet-ganglion center, nerve shoulder-superior disc, nerve shoulder-pedicle, nerve axilla-pedicle, and ganglion center-pedicle was significantly different between the convex and concave side (all p < 0.05), in contrast to the results of nerve axilla-lower pedicle and ganglion center-lower pedicle, which both related to the pedicle of the lower segment (difference not significant). CONCLUSIONS For the first time, information on the anatomical variations between convex and concave sides in scoliotic lumbar spines is described, supported by comparisons with radiographic examinations. These results confirm a topographic anatomical discrepancy. This knowledge can be used in daily perioperative practice for patients undergoing microsurgical decompression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".