MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482696258 · doi:10.1063/1.2822903

Infrared spectra of CO2-doped He4 clusters, HeN4–CO2, with N=1–60

2008· article· en· W1482696258 on OpenAlexaff
A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster (spacecraft)Spectral lineAtomic physicsChemistryHeliumDiodeRotation (mathematics)Jet (fluid)Infrared spectroscopyInfraredAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Molecular physicsMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High resolution spectra of (4)He(N)-CO(2) clusters are studied in the region of the CO(2) nu(3) fundamental band (approximately 2300 cm(-1)). The clusters are produced in a pulsed supersonic jet expansion from a cooled nozzle source and probed by direct absorption using a tunable diode laser operating in a rapid-scan mode. Four carbon dioxide isotopes ((16)O(12)C(16)O, (16)O(13)C(16)O, (18)O(13)C(18)O, and (16)O(13)C(18)O) are used to support the analysis, and because additional rotational transitions are allowed for the asymmetric one ((16)O(13)C(18)O). Resolved R(0) (J=1<--0) rotation-vibration transitions are observed for clusters up to N=60. A detailed rotational analysis is possible up to N approximately 20 and, with some assumptions, to N approximately 37 and beyond. The derived rotational constants (B values) vary smoothly with N and show evidence for broad oscillations similar to those already reported for He(N)-OCS and He(N)-N(2)O. Possible indications of a disruption are observed in the J=2 levels of larger clusters (N>22) which could be caused by interactions with a "dark" helium cluster modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207