Telemetric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Conscious Rats Before and After Compression Injury of Spinal Cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abnormal cardiovascular control after spinal cord injury (SCI) results in hypotension soon after injury. Later, paroxysmal hypertension and bradycardia in response to sensory stimulation below the level of injury develop in most people with SCI. In this study, we used a radiotelemetry system, in rats (n = 7), to investigate the effect of a clinically relevant compression model of SCI at T5 spinal segment on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at rest and in response to colorectal distension. The transducers were implanted 1 month before clip compression (50-g) injury and continuous recording of MAP and HR was established for a period of 2.5 months. SCI was associated with hypotension (86+/-3 mm Hg) at 1 day after injury. In the following 2 days, MAP gradually returned to preinjury levels. By contrast, HR increased at 1 day after SCI and remained unchanged thereafter. Three days after SCI, colorectal distension caused an increase in MAP of 8+/-2 mm Hg accompanied by bradycardia (-18 bpm). One week after SCI, colorectal distension induced an increase in MAP of 9+/-2 mm Hg and bradycardia (-41 bpm). In the following days, the magnitude of reflex hypertension gradually increased, reaching 21+/-4 mm Hg at 1.5 months after SCI. In summary, our data show that resting MAP rapidly returns to control values after SCI. Episodic hypertension associated with autonomic dysreflexia can develop in rats within 1 month after incomplete SCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".