LA EDUCACIÓN COMO TECNOLOGÍA DE TRANSFORMACIÓN: ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO TRANSHISTÓRICO DE LA PRESENCIA DE DEWEY EN IBEROAMÉRICA A COMIENZOS DEL SIGLO XX, DEL MOVIMIENTO DE EDUCACIÓN POPULAR DE LOS AÑOS SETENTA Y DE LA INFLUENCIA DE FREIRE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se trata de un análisis comparativo transhistórico de dos casos que representan proyectos muy diferentes para la transformación de la realidad social y política de América Latina. Se examina el discurso político y educacional del Comité de Cooperación en América Latina. Se compara con el entendimiento de educación popular y su dimensión política explicitada por los exponentes del movimiento en los años setenta y los tempranos ochenta. El proyecto auspiciado por el Comité busca redimir a los pueblos latinoamericanos y generar una sociedad nueva basada en una noción importada de democracia liberal protestante. Mientras, la educación popular se desarrolla a partir de la praxis educacional contrahegemónica, en la cual las bases tenían un papel central. Son exploradas las lecturas que los protestantes ligados al Comité hicieron de Dewey y la lectura que los grupos de educación popular hicieron de Freire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".