Thy-1 Signaling in the Context of Costimulation Provided by Dendritic Cells Provides Signal 1 for T Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxic Effector Molecule Expression, but Fails to Trigger Delivery of the Lethal Hit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross-linking of the GPI-anchored protein Thy-1 results in T cell proliferation and IL-2 synthesis. However, the exact function of Thy-1 in the process of T cell activation remains unknown, as does the effect of costimulation on Thy-1-driven T cell responses. In this study, we have investigated the ability of Thy-1 to substitute for traditional signal 1 in the context of costimulation provided by dendritic cells. Dendritic cells dramatically enhanced T cell proliferation and IL-2 synthesis in response to Thy-1 triggering by anti-Thy-1 mAb. This effect was not dependent on dendritic cell Fcgamma receptors, but was a result of B7-mediated costimulation (signal 2). T cells were also activated when microbeads coated with a combination of anti-Thy-1 and anti-CD28 mAbs were used to supply signals 1 and 2, respectively. Thy-1-stimulated T cells adhere to target cells and express perforin, granzyme B, and Fas ligand, but fail to kill target cells due to an inability to reorganize their secretion machinery. Moreover, in contrast to TCR signaling, Thy-1 triggering failed to induce cytotoxicity in redirected lysis assays. We conclude that Thy-1 triggering can partially substitute for signal 1, which, in combination with a strong signal 2, leads to robust T cell proliferation, IL-2 synthesis, and cytotoxic effector molecule expression, but does not induce cytolytic function. The block at the level of cytotoxic effector function that results when T cells are activated in the absence of a classical, Ag-specific signal 1 may constitute a mechanism to ensure the specificity of CTL responses and prevent potentially harmful promiscuous cytotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".