Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Puget lobe, the southwest-most extension of the Cordilleran ice sheet, provides an excellent opportunity to examine the connection between glacier physics and the resulting products of glaciation. The action of water, at and within the sediments of the glacier bed, is particularly significant for the geologic record of this ice sheet. Physical data and inferred mass balance relationships constrain lobe reconstruction and predict sliding velocities in excess of 500 m/a and water discharges of nearly 1 * 10" m3/a. This sub-glacial water produced a dendritic channel pattern well predicted by static analysis of sub-glacial hydrology. Near to the eastern ice margin, a much larger single channel drained subglacially and episodically, with tributary ice-dammed lakes releasing their water as jokulhlaups. Basal meltwater generated near-hydrostatic water pressures and very low till strengths at the base of the ice sheet. Water pressure dropped only close to the ice margin, allowing normal stresses to rise to significant fractions of the total ice overburden. Thus marginal and interior zones impose contrasting bed conditions. Although observation of sub-glacial deposits will reflect the late-stage passage of the marginal zone, conditions within the ice-sheet interior, far more significant to glacier history and behavior, may be substantially different.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".