MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1483503022

Serious Slowdown of the Global Economy

2001· article· en· W1483503022 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcus Scheiblecker

Bibliographic record

VenueWIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsLiberian dollarQuarter (Canadian coin)RecessionExchange rateUnemploymentInterest rateGlobal recessionMonetary economicsEconomyMacroeconomicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After almost ten years of dynamic expansion, the U.S. economy took an abrupt turn in 2000, its growth declining from over 5 percent in the first half to 1 percent in the fourth quarter. Manufacturing entered a period of contraction, whereas the services sector continued to profit from private household demand which was still holding up. Aware of the pending risks, the Federal Reserve has since been cutting its interest rate fully five times in a row, by altogether 2.5 percentage points. The cheap money allowed consumers in particular to splurge on credit-financed consumption. While this helped to boost growth to 1.3 percent in the first quarter of 2001, the personal savings ratio, already at a negative level in the past, continued to drop. The stuttering economy caused productivity growth to stagnate in the first three months and unemployment to soar. Company surveys found that no turnaround is in sight and that the spectre of recession is still looming. Countries with strong economic ties to the USA are already registering a distinct dip in their exports. Exports by euro zone countries, on the other hand, were not much affected, thanks to the low euro/dollar exchange rate. Hopes that the higher growth rate in 2000 would signal a sustained recovery of the Japanese economy have been dashed by the latest company surveys. Driven primarily by exports in the first half of 2000, the economy suffered a damper as a result of slackening growth in the USA and the precipitous decline of international demand for IT products. Private expenditure continues to be moderate since labour market prospects are still bleak. Job uncertainty puts a check on consumption by private households. In spite of rising oil prices, the Japanese economy last year was unable to extract itself from the deflation spiral. In 2000, GDP in the euro zone and in the EU-15 states rose by 3.4 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively, in real terms, compared to 2.5 percent each in 1999. After briskly expanding until summer, the EU economy lost some of its momentum for the rest of the year. The slightly lower dynamism, however, was not due to its foreign trade, as would be logical when considering the drastic cooling of the U.S. economy, but primarily the result of a slump in domestic demand. Demand for investment suffered from a generally more restrictive monetary policy and a gloomier international outlook. Weakening domestic demand was most pronounced in private consumption. The high oil price, combined with a low euro/dollar exchange rate, impacted on disposable private households incomes and checked the pace of their expenditure on consumption. The economic slowdown was most noticeable in Germany, where private consumption showed hardly any increase in the first quarter of 2001 in spite of tax cuts amounting to 1 percent of GDP, and investment in plant and equipment is similarly reticent. The German construction industry is seriously affected. Its long-standing crisis was accelerated in the first three months of 2001. Surveys find that the downswing experienced throughout the EU is expected to continue on its downward course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports)Same topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207