MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484205195 · doi:10.22564/rbgf.v30i4.235

GEOLOGY, AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS AND GROUND GRAVITY OF THE CENTRAL GRABEN OF ÁGUA BONITA, BRAZIL

2012· article· pt· W1484205195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Geophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrabenGeologyGeomorphologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Há mais de meio século a utilização de dados geofísicos representa importante ferramenta auxiliar nas pesquisas em geociências. Dentre outras características, tais produtos facilitam a discriminação de feições estruturais, ajudam a caracterização de corpos geológicos em subsuperfície e permitem a delimitação de domínios geofísicos com correspondentes geológicos. O Graben de Água Bonita, localizado nos estados de Goiás e Tocantins, foi definido na metade da década de 60 do século XX como uma estrutura de 80 km por 7 km, com bordas paralelas e retilíneas de direção N35-40◦E. O conhecimento desta estrutura restringe-se ao mapeamento geológico, inexistindo dados em profundidade. O presente trabalho trata da interpretação de dados aerogeofísicos do Levantamento Geofísico Brasil-Canadá (PGBC); aquisição e interpretação de dados gravimétricos terrestres visando contribuir ao conhecimento geológico-estrutural do Graben de Água Bonita, situado no contexto do Lineamento Transbrasiliano. A interpretação qualitativa e quantitativa dos dados geofísicos e geológicos originada de modelagem 2D, sugere que o Graben de Água Bonita inclina-se para oeste, devido às baixas anomalias e ao mergulho das sequências sedimentares detríticas. Esta inclinação evidencia que o depocentro da Formação Água Bonita localiza-se a aproximadamente 4 km de profundidade a oeste do limite superficial desta Formação. ABSTRACT: For over half a century geophysical data is an important auxiliary tool used in geosciences research. Among other features, these products facilit at ethe discrimination of structural features, aid the characterization of subsurface geological bodies and allow the delimitation of areas with corresponding geophysica land geological data. The Água Bonita Graben (GAB), which straddles the border of Goiás and Tocantins states, was defined in the mid-60s as an 80-km long by 7-km wide structure, with parallel, straight borders towards N35-40◦E. This paper presents an interpretation of the geophysical data obtained by the the Geophysical Survey Brazil-Canada (Programa de Levantamentos Geofísicos Brasil-Canadá, PGBC), as well as acquisition and interpretation of ground gravity data aiming at improving the geological knowledge of the Água Bonita Graben, situated in the Transbrasilian Lineament. The PGBC geophysical data allowed the extraction of lineaments and geophysical delineation of the GAB limits. The 2D model suggests that the Água Bonita Graben leans to the west, due to the observed low gravity anomaly values and inclined detrital sedimentary sequences dipping 8◦-12◦, in the direction 300◦ to 330◦, suggesting that the depocenter of the Água Bonita Formation is near by the western edge of the graben.Keywords: ground gravity, Água Bonita Graben, Transbrasilian Lineament.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it