Deformable Atlases for the Segmentation of Internal Brain Nuclei in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly employed for the depiction of soft tissues, most notably the human brain. Computer-aided image analysis techniques lead to image enhancement and automatic detection of anatomical structures. However, the information contained in images does not often offer enough contrast to robustly obtain a good detection of all internal brain structures, not least the deep grey matter nuclei. We propose a method that incorporates prior anatomical knowledge in the shape of digital atlases that deform to fit the image data to be analysed. Our technique is based on a combination of rigid, affine and non-rigid registration, segmentation of key anatomical landmarks and propagation of the information of the atlas to detect deep grey matter nuclei. The Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) and Zubal atlases are employed. Results show that detecting important structures such as the ventricles and brain outlines greatly improves the results. Our method is fully automatic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it