MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18745: Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Non-cardiac Surgery Following Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation

2014· article· en· W1484578147 on OpenAlexaff
Marcin Wąsowicz, Summer Syed, Lukasz Starzyk, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Scott Beattie

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMacePercutaneous coronary interventionConventional PCIClopidogrelPerioperativeStentInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionPopulationSurgeryCoronary stentAspirinInterventional cardiologyIncidence (geometry)TroponinRestenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: It is estimated that 5-16% of patients (pts) previously treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and stent implantation will present for elective non-cardiac surgery (NCS) within 1 year. Despite ACC/AHA recommendations on antiplatelet therapy (ATP) the incidence of perioperative major cardiovascular events (MACE) is high. The objective of this multi-center prospective, cohort study was to determine if APT continued throughout perioperative period decreases the incidence of MI in this population and to determine the mechanism of MACE in post-PCI pts undergoing NCS. Hypothesis: There is an association between inadequate platelet inhibition and the incidence of MACE in pts undergoing NCS after previous PCI. Method: After REB approval pts after previous PCI scheduled for elective NCS were recruited. The primary outcome was Major Adverse Cardiac Event (defined as MI, stent thrombosis, need for revascularization or 30 day mortality). The incidence of MI was blindly adjudicated in duplicate using the 3 rd Univ. definition of MI. Troponin levels were measured every 8h for 2 days, then once daily until discharge in addition to ECG measurements. All pts patient was followed up for any clinical symptoms of MI. The location of MI was also judged based on its location (area of stent or not). The platelet inhibition by aspirin (ASA) and/or clopidogrel was measured using the Platelet Mapping Assay (PMA) performed preoperatively, 1h and 24h after surgery. Results: A total of 201 pts were recruited. The incidence of MACE was 21%. Additionally, 11 pts (5%) had isolated troponin elevation. The location of the MI occurred frequently in the area of the stent placement (71%). Pts. exposed to ASA with 5 days of surgery had better platelet inhibition than pts no exposed. There was no difference in platelet inhibition between pts suffering from MI and those who did not. Several factors were associated with increased MACE. These included higher Revised Cardiac Risk Index and pre- and post-operative anemia. 30 patients (15%) suffered from major bleeding complications. Conclusions: Results of this study indicated that use of ASA, or its withdrawal, was not associated with MACE in post PCI patients undergoing NCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→