MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heart-Heath Intervention reduces cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment of the cerebrovascular type: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (I9-3A)

2015· article· en· W1484607333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gregory A. Jicha, Richard Murphy, Martha Biddle, Debra K. Moser

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialPlaceboCognitionMedicineCognitive impairmentCognitive declineClinical trialIntervention (counseling)Internal medicineCardiologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryDementiaAlternative medicinePathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Clinical trial of the Heart-Health Nursing Intervention to modify vascular risk factors for cognitive decline in subjects with mild cognitive impairment due to cerebrovascular disease: preliminary results Background: Cerebrovascular disease is a major cause and comorbid pathology in community-based elderly populations. It is unknown whether aggressive risk factor modification can prevent further cognitive decline or allow improvement in cognitive function in such individuals. Design/Methods: Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the Heart-Health Intervention in subjects age >54 years with mild cognitive impairment presumed due to cerebrovascular disease. Subjects were enrolled and underwent cognitive testing at 6 month intervals, as well as brain imaging and CSF collection at baseline. Standard comparative statistics were used to assess efficacy of the Heart-Health nursing education intervention in the early stages of the trial. Results: Baseline MRI scans confirmed significant vascular pathology as responsible for the cognitive impairment in the subjects recruited. While Placebo treated subjects declined an average of 0.7 points annually on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and 2.7 points on the California Verbal Learning Test trail 1-5 learning, subjects undergoing the Heart-Health Intervention improved on average 1.5 and 1.25 points on these tests respectively in the first 6 months of engagement in the trial (p<0.05). Conclusions: Aggressive risk factor modification and vascular risk education programming shows early benefit in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in subjects with mild cognitive impairment due to underlying cerebrovascular disease. The total duration of the trial is 36 months, and so it is unknown if the effects of the intervention will be sustained throughout the entire study treatment period. While these preliminary results are encouraging, completion of the trial is necessary to adequately judge the potential benefit of this intervention in preventing further cognitive decline and progression to fulminate vascular dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207