Calorie restriction on insulin resistance and expression of SIRT1 and SIRT4 in ratsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this special issue entitled “Second International Symposium on Recent Advances in Basic, Clinical, and Social Medicine” and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sirtuin proteins are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dependent deacetylases and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosyl transferases associated with metabolic balance and lifespan extension. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and sirtuin 4 (SIRT4) have been reported to regulate insulin secretion, but their association with the development of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease remain undefined. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of SIRT1 and SIRT4 in the liver and pancreas of rats fed with different diets and analyze the association of these proteins with insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into the following 4 diet treatment groups: normal control (NC), calorie restriction (CR), high-fat (HFa), and high-fructose (HFr), and these groups were maintained for 12 weeks. Blood biochemical analysis and histopathology indicated that HFa and HFr groups were insulin resistant and developed nonalcoholic fatty livers. SIRT1 was present in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the pancreatic beta-cells, while SIRT4 was located in the cytoplasm. Treatment with the CR diet increased the expression of SIRT1 in both the pancreas and liver, while treatment with the HFa and HFr diets caused a decrease. SIRT4 was upregulated in the liver of rats treated with the HFa diet, but did not change with the CR diet treatment. These data suggest that SIRT1 and SIRT4 were both involved in the development of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".